Comment #4 on issue 2379 by [email protected]: resetting autoBeaming after a
cadenza
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2379
These are three different issue reports. The title and issue description
is about autoBeaming after cadenze when a grace note is first, then follows
a comment "David Bobroff restated the problem" which is totally about
something else, namely accidental behavior after cadenze. Then follows a
comment "David Bobroff sent in another bug report" which is about the
original problem.
Then follows another report about accidental behavior _inside_ of cadenze
when explicit barlines are used.
Can we get this kind of stuff better sorted? It makes it rather hard to
address individual problems when they are all clumped into a single report.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
