Comment #5 on issue 3904 by [email protected]: robots.txt: disallow old
stable and old development doc
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3904
dynamics site:lilypond.org/doc/v2.12
That doesn't work. (Try it.) The pages are not indexed at all and won't
turn up in any search no matter how specific.
we currently have a redirect from doc/stable to doc/v2.18. I don't know
if copying (?) the contents in doc/stable would be a good idea.
Could the redirect just point in the opposite direction?
PageRank updates rather quickly, for sure mure more quickly than LilyPond
release cycle :-)
They re-crawl the web and recompute the rankings very frequently, but the
rankings are based in large part on links that may never update. The 2.12
documentation continued to rank highly for a long time after new versions
came out presumably because of many other web pages (such as mailing list
archives) that link to it. If the current documentation was always in
doc/stable, the web would gradually accumulate links pointing there and
eventually there would be enough to beat 2.12's rank. I don't know how long
it would take.
I don't think that we should mind too much about Wayback machine.
I admit that it may be irrelevant in practice, unless LilyPond vanishes
from the web, which seems unlikely. It bothers me for "moral" reasons: I
don't like the fact that domain owners can retroactively unpublish material
from the Internet Archive using robots.txt, and this is one case where it
can easily be fixed because the owner never wanted it taken down to begin
with.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
