Comment #4 on issue 4156 by [email protected]: Patch: Define Smob<> constructors.
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4156
I've weeded out several copy constructors that were not actually supposed
to be used, removed assert(false) copy constructors, put appropriate
comments for declared but now undefined copy constructors, made the copy
constructor of Smob<> private, catered for the resulting warnings (why only
warnings, gcc?!?) by reverting to the default constructor on initialization
instead.
Also beefed up non-constructability on Smob{1,2,3}.
I hope this addresses your main points in a clearer manner than originally
proposed.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
