Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: ---
Cc: [email protected]
Comment #10 on issue 4387 by [email protected]: Patch: Let \relative work
on \transpose content as if it were untransposed
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4387
This is sort of a use case. I mean, there must be _some_ reason this
has been a topic sometimes.
Searching the -user mailing lists for \relative \transpose, I found the
question come up twice
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-02/msg00657.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-05/msg00280.html
where the behavior of \relative in the patch above would have worked better
for these users.
Federico asked for explanation of the meaning of the documentation about
how \relative skips over \transpose now, so he could translate it.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-01/msg00021.html
So the suggestion at the head of this issue is a good one. LilyPond would
be easier to use with
\relative c' { c4 a c e \transpose c f {c a c e} }
=> { c'4 a c' e' { f' d' f' a' } }
but we would have to convert-ly existing \transpose to \absolute\transpose
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
