I can confirm the bug oon version 2.19.48. The workaround still works fine.


** [issues:#794] Arrow head upsets short arpeggios**

**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:27 AM UTC by Anonymous
**Last Updated:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:27 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody

 (5.4 kB; image/png)

*Originally created by:* *anonymous

*Originally created by:* [v.villenave](http://code.google.com/u/v.villenave/)
*Originally owned by:* [v.villenave](http://code.google.com/u/v.villenave/)

% New report from Robin Bannister:

% Although short arpeggios are generally correctly printed, when an arrow
% is specified it upsets the arpeggio's placement.

% It looks like ly:arpeggio::print is careless at     heads\[dir\] -=

\version "2.12.1" %reproduced with 2.13.3

workaround = \override Arpeggio \#'positions =
 \#\(lambda \(grob\) \(interval-widen \(ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob\) 

 \override Arpeggio \#'arpeggio-direction = \#DOWN
 <c' g'>4 \arpeggio <c' f'>4 \arpeggio
% \workaround
 <c' e'>4 \arpeggio <c' d'>4 \arpeggio % arrow too long for one wiggle


Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list

Reply via email to