- **status**: Fixed --> Verified


---

** [issues:#5057] Fix a number of SCM/int confusions.**

**Status:** Verified
**Labels:** Fixed_2_19_55 
**Created:** Sun Feb 05, 2017 05:23 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Sat Feb 11, 2017 04:42 PM UTC
**Owner:** David Kastrup
**Attachments:**

- 
[regtest.txt](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5057/attachment/regtest.txt)
 (20.6 kB; text/plain)


Fix a number of SCM/int confusions.


Contains commits:

Stop SCM/int confusion in stencil head registration


Stop SCM/int confusion in program-option code


Stop SCM/int confusion in Drum_notes_engraver


Stop SCM/int confusion for grob interface table


Stop SCM/int confusion in function documentation tables


Stop SCM/int confusion for property profiling


Use Protected_scm.is_bound () with Scheme engravers


Add Protected::is_bound () function

Since SCM_UNBNDP has problems with arguments of type Protected_scm, an
alternative member function seems like a viable alternative.

http://codereview.appspot.com/314440043


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

Reply via email to