Another exmaple of tie obscured by accidental: compare fis vs f at counts 3 and 
9
\version "2.18"
{
    \key g \major   
        \time 12/8  
        \tempo 4. = 132 

  
  g8~ 
  <g~ d'~>8 
  <g~ d'~ fis'~>8  
  <g~ d'~ fis'~ b'>8 
  <g~ d'~ fis'~ d''>8 
  <g~ d'~ fis'~ g''>8  
  g8~ 
  <g~ d'~>8 
  <g~ d'~ f'~>8  
  <g~ d'~ f'~ b'>8 
  <g~ d'~ f'~ d''>8 
  <g~ d'~ f'~ g''>8
                              
}


---

** [issues:#298] Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental**

**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Wed Feb 14, 2007 07:58 PM UTC by Anonymous
**Last Updated:** Fri Apr 14, 2017 09:48 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


*Originally created by:* *anonymous

*Originally created by:* 
[[email protected]](http://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/)

Steve D posted a [long 
email](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00541.html) 
that pertains to ties between single and
multiple voice sections of notation of polyphonic instruments.


He later wrote:
> From my point of view, the bug, if there is a bug besides the fact that the 
> tie is not visible because it is so short, is that the tie stops short of an 
> accidental symbol that is *not* associated with the note being tied, and in 
> addition, that note happens to be the top \(or
bottom\) note of a chord.

> It seems to me that, ideally, when either the top or bottom note of a chord 
> is tied, the tie should extend from notehead to notehead, or from the first 
> notehead to an accidental \(if there is one\) preceding the second notehead, 
> \*if\* and only if that accidental belongs to the note being tied instead of 
> another note in close proximity \(another note that is perhaps an interval of 
> a second or third from the note being tied\). Otherwise, if it is a top or 
> bottom note of a chord, the tie should \(again, merely from my current 
> perspective\) arc over \(or under\) the accidental symbol of another note in 
> order to nearly connect to the notehead of the note that is being tied. \(if 
> that makes any sense\) :-\) 

> I can imagine cases where the current behavior of LilyPond \(2.11.13 in this 
> case\) would seem appropriate, *if* the tie is between two notes that are 
> *not* at the top or bottom of a chord.


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

Reply via email to