I've just hit this very issue... Simon, what exactly is your 'easy
workaround'? Is it a global one? Maybe it makes sense to document it until it
gets fixed. Or do we already have a snippet for that?
---
** [issues:#649] Let accidentals on tied notes across a break be valid for
subsequent notes**
**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Wed Jul 16, 2008 03:54 PM UTC by Anonymous
**Last Updated:** Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:07 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
**Attachments:**
-
[foo.PNG](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/649/attachment/foo.PNG)
(8.4 kB; image/png)
*Originally created by:* *anonymous
*Originally created by:*
[[email protected]](http://code.google.com/u/103930840119366314519/)
An accidental on a broken tied note should be valid for the length of the bar
after the break.
In this example, the second `cis` in bar 2 shouldn't have an accidental.
~~~~
:::TeX
\version "2.11.53"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0
}
\relative c' {
cis1 ~ \break
cis2 cis
}
~~~~
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
