Haha, that's unfair... ;)
In this case, the only solution would be to widen the gap between the beams.
But, obviously, this is hardly readable because it very much obscures the
stave-lines.
For that reason, Gould writes (Beams wit opposite stem directions, p. 26):
"... provided that [...] the top and bottom stave-lines remain clear of a beam"
That way, you'll have a maximum of only three "allowed" beams within the stave.
I don't know either how this should look, probably because nearly anything
would be better than that solution. Beam outside even if it takes lots of space
or split up the monster beam.
---
** [issues:#5036] 128 beaming output not producing output as expected (?)**
**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Fri Jan 20, 2017 01:43 PM UTC by Palmer Ralph
**Last Updated:** Sun Apr 23, 2017 01:42 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
Noeck wrote :
is this a bug or done on purpose? The following snippet produces beams
of which the lowest beam does not touch the staff line below.
~~~~
{ g128[ g] }
~~~~
The small-gaps-fill-with-ink theory should avoid this. IMHO the output
would look better like this:
~~~~
{
\override Beam.positions = #'(2.7 . 2.7)
g128[ g]
}
~~~~
What do the experts think?
This has been discussed at some length on the user list.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
