> Needs more tidying up (see Rietveld)
Perhaps a misunderstanding: My Rietveld comment #6 was a response to David, it
is not related to the patch itself, which is OK and ready to push. I will
prepare a *follow-up* patch.
---
** [issues:#5450] relocate.cc: Introduce new command `set?'.**
**Status:** Started
**Created:** Fri Dec 21, 2018 04:55 PM UTC by Werner LEMBERG
**Last Updated:** Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:26 AM UTC
**Owner:** Werner LEMBERG
relocate.cc: Introduce new command `set?`.
Contrary to `set`, `set?` won't override environment variables that are
already set.
We need this for reproducable builds, in particular with gub: The standard
fontconfig setup includes font files like `~/.fonts` or `/usr/share`, which
obviously must not be used. Up to now, the `fontconfig.reloc` file in gub
uses the `set` relocation command, which doesn't allow gub to replace the
fontconfig configuration file with a temporary alternative while building
test files or documentation. Future changes in gub will use `set?` instead.
http://codereview.appspot.com/345160043
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
