Yep.
Though, said snippet compiles with 2.18. Thus there's no need to put it in 
snippet/new, **if** it is present in /Documentation/snippets.
So the need to run makelsr.

To come out of the dilemma, would it be reasonable to commit a run of makelsr 
as a single patch and delay Malte's patch?


---

** [issues:#5251] document restNumberThreshold**

**Status:** Started
**Created:** Tue Jan 09, 2018 07:58 PM UTC by Malte Meyn
**Last Updated:** Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:16 PM UTC
**Owner:** Malte Meyn
**Attachments:**

- 
[restNumberThreshold.png](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5251/attachment/restNumberThreshold.png)
 (2.7 kB; image/png)


As it’s fairly common, recommended by Gould, and—depending on house style for 
longer measures—sometimes necessary to have single measure MMRs marked with a 
“1” in orchestral parts, it should be documented how this can be achieved:
```
\set restNumberThreshold = 0
```
The default seems to be “unset” but in multi-measure-rest-engraver.cc it is 
hardcoded to 1; you won’t find this value in engraver-init.ly.


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
  • [Lilypond-... Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
    • [Lily... Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
    • [Lily... Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
    • [Lily... Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
    • [Lily... Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
    • [Lily... Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto

Reply via email to