The considerations on beam subdivision in [#5547] are probably pertinent.
---
** [issues:#2474] tuplet beaming may be confusing**
**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Tue Apr 10, 2012 01:55 PM UTC by Anonymous
**Last Updated:** Fri Jul 13, 2012 09:30 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
*Originally created by:* *anonymous
*Originally created by:*
[[email protected]](http://code.google.com/u/108726151468716100207/)
*Originally owned by:*
[[email protected]](http://code.google.com/u/108726151468716100207/)
opening a new issue from the discussion in
[https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2470](#2470)
would be great if someone could quote standards about how to beam tuplets, or,
more specifically, whether there are cases when beaming can \(should\) be
different from tuplet spanners.
beaming together tuplets of eighthnotes may be particularly confusing if the
tuplets involve quarters \(which can't be beamed\).
a simple \(but perhaps too drastic\) way would be to set all beamExceptions in
time-signature-settings.scm to have \(\(1 . 12\) . \(3 3 ...\)\) as smallest
setting, but this will certainly change behaviour of sixteenth patterns in,
say, 2/2, 3/2 or 9/4 times.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
