- **Needs**: -->
- **Patch**: new --> needs_work
- **Type**: -->
---
** [issues:#5167] Allow defining markup commands in LilyPond syntax**
**Status:** Started
**Created:** Fri Jul 28, 2017 06:55 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Mon Feb 17, 2020 09:47 AM UTC
**Owner:** David Kastrup
Allow defining markup commands in LilyPond syntax
This works with assignments of the form
\markup with-red = \markup \with-color #red \etc
or similar. The resulting definition (in addition to being available
as \with-red command inside of markups) can be used with the `markup'
macro and also gets a `make-with-red-markup' convenience function.
Also contains commits:
markup-partial regtest: use \markup function assignment
Changes: show \markup xxx = ... \etc assignments
Parser: let `assignment_id' return a symbol
That's actually what's needed rather than a string.
Split off `markup-lambda' from `define-markup-command'
Also markup-list-lambda from define-markup-list-command.
Let `make-markup' fetch the signature itself
Also don't export it from markup-macros.scm: it is an internal function.
Reorganize markup commands to use object properties
This loosens the ties between the actual markup function and its
calling methods.
http://codereview.appspot.com/324140043
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list._______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
