Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb am 2001-09-12, 18:42:
>"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I fetched your vesion of guile-1.4-1.
>
>[For GNU/windows, I presume]
Cygwin.
>> It is not stripped:
>> Is it a problem to strip it? Have I missed the point?
>
>No problem to strip it. As far as I know, Guile is packaged simply by
>doing `make install prefix=/tmp/somewhere', and rolling a tarball,
>like all other packages.
>
>So, it seems that the decision not to strip is made by the Guile
>team, really.
I did nothing else and it was installed stripped...
>> I have my own version and I'm looking forward to include it in the
>> 'official' cygwin netrelease, once the no-new-package moratorium is
>> lifted.
>>
>> Any objections if I take over the mantenance of guile?
>
>No, that would be nice. To be fair, maintaining the Windows
>distribution and binaries is a pain for us, non-windows developers.
>Are you a LilyPond user? Don't hesitate to ask the same for LilyPond
>herself :-)
No LilyPond user yet, but i'm interested in that great program and
want to try to use it.
>Greetings,
>Jan.
--
=^..^=
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
