Citat Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bottom line: I think we should introduce a mapping (for each style > (default, mensural, baroque, ...) an scm function) with a common > definition range; but we have to agree on the definition range.
Sounds reasonable. I don't think we have to agree on the definition range; instead I would (as earlier stated) prefer to allow the functions to be incomplete so that one could state a list of functions rather than just one function. The first function in the list containing the requested glyph should be used. (Again, the trivial example: If we had a function just mapping the quarter-rest to the classical quarter rest and nothing else, one could request for classical quarter rests by simply adding this function to the front of the list) Btw, is the ligature stuff explained somewhere - I could not find anything on the www...? -Rune _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
