> Citat Chris Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > comments). A similar problem occurs with () meaning either Scheme or
> > a
> > phrasing-slur, depending on context, and the emacs syntax table
> > doesn't understand context.
>
> Well, I don't think it matters whether a paren is a slur or a scheme-paren, does
> it?
> The problem is that all parens except {} and <> needs to be matched individually
> (i.e. ( { ) } is legal)
>
> > I suppose a solution might be to write a lily-specific paren-blinking
> > function.
This will certainly be needed if we want to cope with cases like
[c d ( e f] [ g a ) b c]
which the Emacs builtin matching algorithm isn't designed to
cope with.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
