On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> ...
>
> An imho better way of solving the problem would be to use overlapping beams:
>
>
> |\
> | \
> | \
> | | \
> | \
> | | \
> \ \
> \ |
> | |
> | \ |
> | |
> | \|
> | |
> \ |
> \ |
> \ |
> \|
>
>
> This approach is also more safe against rounding errors leading to thin white
> lines within the object.
>
Yes, agreed. But it will at the same time introduce a new danger
regarding rounding errors:
|\|\
| \ \
| | \
| \ \
| | \
| \|
\| \
\ ||
| |
| \ ||
| |
| \||
| \|
\ |
\ |
\ |
\|
Greetings,
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Juergen Reuter
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Juergen Reuter
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Laura Conrad
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: ledger lines Rune Zedeler
- Re: ledger lines Rune Zedeler
- [PATCH] ledger lines Juergen Reuter
- [PATCH] ledger lines Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Juergen Reuter
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Juergen Reuter
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines Rune Zedeler
