[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > \recurse ..." which would scan down through the children and perform the change > all the way down (of course only on the children having "local copies" already). > Perhaps we could just change the "set" and "override" commands instead of > making new commands - so that
We could do that---assuming that we could get an efficient, consistent implementation that does not waste memory (doesn't seem trivial)---but who needs all this complicated semantics? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
