[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > ... > > The reason for having this `loose' criterion is that I really don't > > want to deal with bugreports for 1.4 anymore. The codebase of 1.5 is > > diverging from 1.5 a lot. > > > > Sure, but if we succeed in building a 1.6 version that really serves the > attribute "stable", then you will have to deal with less bugreports for > 1.6 while working on 1.7.
We won't start 1.7 before 1.6 is reasonably stable. Besides, LilyPond is now so modular that we can do a lot of grotesque hacking in a stable release by putting the code into a by-default-unused module. Also 1.5 doesn't get much bugtesting now -- releasing 1.6 is a much more effective way of testing the program :-) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
