Ok. I take it back. I've set some of my own jazz charts using 1.5.55 and the spacing is amazingly beautiful. With 1.4.8 I was using forced \break's to give the charts some breathing room (and cover up a lot of ugliness when setting chords tightly). But with 1.5.55 they set perfectly without any forced breaks.
Vertical spacing between chord parts has improved too. Good job! (Just in case anyone forgets to say, often enough, how beautiful the output of lilypond is). I'll go through some of the samples I generated that brought about the original comment and see whether I can be more specific. My vague impression was that the vertical positioning of note heads was a little off in some of the regression tests, but that's definitely not a problem in my stuff. Regards, Robin Davies. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robin Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 3:20 PM Subject: Building on CygWin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Voila. So far, I've run a handful of sample files all of which seem to work > > properly as far as I can tell (although the spacing is kinda ugly). > > Bugreport? Lily 1.5 should have better spacing than 1.4, instead of worse. > > > -- > > Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Lilypond-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
