[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The concert went well. > I talked to the composer and he agreed to include the score in lilypond > as long as his name was maintained and as long as he kept the copyrights > - that is people are not allowed to make changes to the score.
Sure, we could add that. But I hope he understands that there is little that will bar people from breaking that condition; if you supply source, it would be easy. OTOH, you made an automated score in a few days, so it's not that difficult anyway. (BTW, Mutopia doesn't take submissions on a "no modification" basis, does it?) > I think including CLA(O)P II is a Good Thing because it stress tests > lilypond very well. This is also why I think that including only an > excerpt from it is stupid. > I am not sure how the inclusion should be. > The raw lilypond file is 750k; gzip'ed 40k. Ok, BTW, it should come with some notes for people wanting to perform the piece; usually those are in the front of the score. > Alternatively one could include the generating c-file into lilypond. > Or perhaps we should just wait till I manage to redo it in scheme... :-) I prefer Python -- Scheme is probably not convenient, and C files give headaches with compile & configure commands. It's quite easy to transcribe C source to python. including a 750 k .ly file is a little over the top, if you ask me. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
