Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, correction: "I use". I suggest we don't fix this until a GCC is > released that really removes the feature.
Or maybe until someone wants to create a translation of the manual. In any case, I would suggest to use multiline strings only for 'docstrings'. > I find easily editable docstrings more important adhering than some > stupid standard which isn't really enforced yet. It's already being 'enforced' by xgettext, in that you can't localise those strings. Can't/shouldn't we think of a smart preprocessor hack, or an emacs c-mode hack. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
