[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I concider the linewidth=-1 option to be ugly. > I would like this option instead: > > --- Don't try to fill a whole number of systems - but accept that the > piece can end with an unfinished (shorter) system. --- > > Reasons: > -Would be perfect for editing: > -Would be a lot faster - spacing would be O(n) instead of > O(n*idontknowwhatitisnowbutveryslow).
Spacing and line breaking are not the bottleneck; lily is O(n) on the whole (well perhaps more O(n log n + k n^2 ) with a very small k. ) For the rest, I like the proposal. However, I would try to add it on top of gourlay-breaking.cc if I were you. Just try to space the last line (or anything up till a linebreak) with width = -1, and discard it if it doesn't fit. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
