[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I think it should be possible with > > > > \translator StaffGroup = up > > \translator Staff = stwo > > No, this was also my 1st thought. > Problem is that the child of "StaffGroup" is "Staff", and hence > "\translator StaffGroup = up" tries to move the STAFF (and not the > VOICE) to the new staffgroup. > This simple example still looks fairly right - but when things get more > complicated it gets totally - ehm - I gotta watch my language now... :-) > In this simple example you can see that things go wrong on the rightmost > bar line - it does not (as it should) connect the two lowermost staves.
(crossposts trimmed). OK; so I guess we only want threads and voices to move around, so we should have syntax like. ... No wait -- I think that this is fairly uncommon; I think it is better to devise a Scheme level solution (like providing functions to move around contexts), and see if that gets used so much that it warrants new syntax. How about that? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
