> If "man round" on a system says
>
> #include <math.h>
> [..]
> double round(double x);
>
> then it should have round() in math.h; otherwise it is broken:
> either the manpage is wrong, or the header file is buggy. I don't
> think it is my job to determine where it exactly
Point taken. You are right: My glibc library is broken
w.r.t. round(). Until now there wasn't a similar library problem with
lilypond, thus I think the workaround is justified for the sake of
backwards compatibility -- normally, people always think that lilypond
is the problem, not glibc.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
