followup to lilypond-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi Han-Wen, > > I am rebuilding Pedro's Debian packages, as usual. However, > a dear user missed the lilypond.vim file last time. It is > definitely not contained in any Debian packages. May I ask > you to check whether it is actually installed by the vanilla > build system? I can't really see through that complicated
It's in the .tar.gz , it's not installed by default. You should take up this issue with your Favorite Package Maintainer (tm). > jungle. In the previous release one could also find a > lilypond.wordlist.vim or similar; it is also gone now. I > have no idea what these files are, when they were missed > from the the previous package, I simply mailed them to the > requesting person, and that was it. Could you enlighten me, > please? I think they're generated now. > > As a side note, lily/parser.yy #includes <stdio.h> twice, > while lily/lily-guile.cc does not #include <ctype.h> at all. > Are these bugs? fixed. > By the way, I am reaching the point where most of the time I > can make Lily do what I want, and what's more, the solution > starts to seem natural... :) I have the feeling that the > tutorial/user manual goes a bit too far in hiding the > momentarily unnecessary background, making the 'second step' > very hard to make. Would it be possible to add some small > print here and there? Sure it's possible, but we have to be careful with making the tutorial too complex. Too much trees will obscure the forest; I'd rather have the second step in some manual parts that follow the tutorial. Any ideas? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
