[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I think better separating the font stuff from the main > distribution would have the following advantages: > > 1. Tracking LilyPond development would be easier for the > non-uber-hackers due to > a) shorter build times and
Are you using potrace? It is a lot faster than autotrace. If you are desparate, try make -C mf get-pfa it will download the PFAs from the lilypond.org site. > 4. Storing packages for various architectures would require > much less storage space in the distribution archives and > their mirrors (this issue has already been raised by > Debian, which hosts the most architectures AFAIK. The > lilypond-doc package also goes in this direction.) You're encouraged to make a noarch package of the docs; I couldn't get RPM to do it, though. > 2. Are you willing to move them in a separate repository and > issue separate release notes? > 3. Have you got a better idea how this should be done instead? No, no. > 4. Can you think of any related issues? Yes: it will cause dependency problems and spurious bugreports. I think it's a bad idea. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
