[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >> now we have a conventional (out/*, image alt only) and www > >> (out-www/*, image src present) Info documentation. Should > >> the files of the latter override those of the former when > >> installed? > > > > Yes. If possible - the idea is that the lilypond package > > has the info files without .png, and lilypond-doc has the > > PNGs for those info files. > > And the replacement info files which reference those PNGs, I > guess.
No, our idea was to have the info files that reference the PNGs be distributed with the base package. (or I'm mistaken. Jan?) > >> Analogously, we also have *.pfa fonts in mf/out and > >> mf/out-www, which are mostly the same. What's the role > >> of this? > > > > That's strange, out-www/ shouldn't contain pfa files. Can you > > investigate how they ended up there? > > To be honest I'm pretty much lost with the stepmake build > system. I will try my best, but some guidance would be most > welcome. Just redirect the output of the build process into a log file, and see where it says out-www/*.pfa -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
