> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:36:45 +0200 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > Would it be more beatiful, if the length of the slur were > > > (approximately) > > > doubled, and the slur were at the middle point (shown as `o� in the > > examples below): > > > > > > It's best to check some good hand-engraved editions to see what the > > proper solution is. I haven't seen what you suggest, but maybe I am > > misunderstanding you. > > Probably. I would like to see one (possibly cut) slur between two notes > (with a > line break between), not two or more subsequent slurs between two > notes. > Ideologically, that is the only right solution, which might have been > erronously > done even in hand-engraved editions. Simply, think that does "a()()b" > or > "a()()()b" or any sense?
Looks like in hand-engraved music "a()()b" really does make sense. I found from the net some beautifully engraved music in which that was used. So, I'll take back my arguments. Hand-engraving is a (hand-)proven standard. In Bach's Aria (con Variazioni): http://www.sheetmusicarchive.net/dlpage_new.cfm?composition_id=9 I found that also fingerings my be tied: c2-"1(5)" This means that c2 is first played with thumb and then, without lifting the key, the fingering is changed to little finger. Greetings, Heikki Junes _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
