> > We have a roadmap, sort of, which is to implement the following > > features for the next major release: > > > > * support for font-encooding like latin1, cyrillic, etc. > > What about aiming at unicode?
Yes, this would be a good thing, but it doesn't solve the main problem of how to handle scripts which don't have a one-to-one relation between input character codes and output glyphs. > > An example of excellent bug-reports is the bug-collection of > > Werner Lemberg, see for example > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-03/msg00138.html > > This example is missing an/the expected behaviour. I try my best to give verbal descriptions how it should look like. Usually, it costs a lot of time to provide a small example which shows the problem in isolation. Sometimes I can't afford more time to make the bug report really complete... Werner _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
