Andreas Rottmann writes: > I've some talking with Rob Browning about that; I've taken over > maintainership of G-Wrap and will release a 1.9.0 pretty soon > now. I'll then package the new G-Wrap for Debian (which will coexist > with the old g-wrap packages).
Great, this is very good news! > I think after we have a G-Wrap 1.9.0 release, we can release tarballs > of Guile-GNOME soonish. > As soon as we have tarballs out (and g-wrap 1.9 is packaged), I can > go ahead and work to close the now already long-standing ITP on > guile-gobject. And this! > As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason; > It used to work. Ok. We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS. > I think testing and new code using the bindings would be nice. Other > than that, I can't think of something ATM. Ok, then I'll keep doing what I'm doing (which is just that). Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
