> ah, i see. Sounds sensible. Now what about this example?
>
> -------
> | --|
> | |
> o o
>
> not 100% clear how it would it be notated, but something like
> c8[[ c16]]
> would work
I would prefer
c8[ c16[]]
since the second beam is attached to the second note only. This makes
the algorithm much simpler: `[' starts a beam, `]' ends it, and this
can be nested arbitrarily. There is just a single problem, namely to
decide the direction (left or right) of beams attached to a single
note:
----------------- -----------------
| --| | | |-- |
| | | vs. | | |
o o o o o o
Perhaps this:
c8[ c16[<] c8] c8[ c16[>] c8]
in case an ambiguity arises.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
