[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > return the second I omitted the patch :-) > > If I may ask conversely, what is there to be gained from using > $(foreach) ? It seems that the output produced by for is a little bit > more compact and readable, and the results are identical.
It was actually prompted by some incompatibility in bash long ago, IIRC. I can't remember the details. > > Matthias > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
