On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote: > On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the > >> bottom line > >> is way off. see attachment. > > > > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is > > perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is > > wrong. > > Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks? > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ > Rehearsal-marks.html
Yes, it's exactly the same. Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
