Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> Ah.. I didn't think this was allowed (or at least not recommended). Using >> \include at anything else than top level is a kind of substitute for macros, >> and macros is something we don't want.. > > I guess that creating macros with \include is sufficiently painful to > deter people from actually doing it.
It seems that I like pain then :-) _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
