so that non-subscribers who send email can partake in the discussion.
I have no experience with drum notation, but this may be of interest to somebody else
on lilypond-devel, so I'll send it there.
- Graham
On 2-Feb-05, at 8:09 AM, Peter Mogensen wrote:
Hi,
I write to you because I do not subscribe to lilypond-devel and I see that you replied on one of the posts.
I've read the post:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-09/msg00180.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-12/msg00143.html
I agree with the posters that Lilypond needs just a little extra features to be fully usable for percussion notation.
My personal problem is flams, drags, ruffs and rolls. However, the notation used in most Danish marching bands is a bit different from the one referenced in the above posts.
To describe it shortly we use:
Flams: single 8th gracenote with a stroke. With or without a tie. Like:
flam = \drums { \override Stem #'stroke-style = #"grace" \grace sn8 }
Rolls: Three strokes across the stem, like a tremolo. Preferable thinner strokes and _not_ alligned with any beams.
Ruffs: Ditto... but only two strokes.
The biggest problem with the current implementation is that tremolo strokes are alligned to the beam of an 8th note, which makes a ruff look very wrong when applied to a beamed note.
I hope this can be of use for the developers.
regards, Peter Mogensen
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
