[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 00:28 +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > > The reason for my remark was pure prejudice. The website looks a bit > > hi-tech, > > and it happens (too) often that hi-tech-looking pages use bad html. When > > someone reported that it didn't work, I just did a quick w3c check. > > Well, no one ever told me a site of mine looks hi-tech... I'll take that > as a big complimente 8^). > > > IMHO, there is a big point in using PD for LSR: Many snippets may be > > directly > > usable by cut&paste in .ly files, and it would be good to allow everyone to > > do this without restrictions. > > Your point is better than mine. > > So, manual authors, any problem if some manual snippets and fragments of > text pass into the public domain? I think that this is legally different
Please go ahead. > BTW: Hurray for Yuval Harel who officially added the first externally > contributed snippet 8^). Cool! -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
