[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > then I'd vote for the first, as (www.lilypond.org) looks half-baken to > > me. > > not really, if you type www.lilypond.org in any browser it'll work (and > will look less cluttered). something like > > Engraved by LilyPond 2.5.x (www.lilypond.org)
OK, you've got me convinced. As a corollorary for point & click PDF support, we can dump URLs, so I made a the www.lilypond.org clickable. I'm curious what it will do for our ranking in Google once 2.6 PDFs start to flood the internet :-) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
