By the way, why is the index entitled "Unified Index"? I have never seen this formulation used anywhere else and from the email list, I have got the impression that many people have never realized that the manual has an index. I propose to rename it simply to "Index".
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
On 12-May-05, at 2:50 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote: > Should I stop using @cindex for everything? If so, what do I use > instead?
have a look at the texinfo manual. @cindex is for concepts (cp), fn for functions (@findex), etc.
Ok... but in lilypond.tely we merge all the indices together. Should I split it up
somewhat?
IMHO the maximum amount of splitting should be this:
findex: commands (ie \foo stuff)
tindex (or vindex): properties, contexts (we might want to index #'padding or Score)
cindex: everything else
If we're going to keep everything as the unified index, I might as well continue
using @cindex.
Cheers, - Graham
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
