Kristof Bastiaensen wrote:
However, then I have to understand the code, and I'm missing the big
picture of what is happening. Maybe you could write a short overview of
the structure of your implementation? In particular, what data do you
use, and how do you store it?
Actually I have only changed the internals of the determine-split-list
function. It takes (almost) the same data-types, and returns the same
data-types. The only change is that the recording group engraver now
also sends an association list of settable properties (and the
succes-values are removed before calling the determine-split-list
function).
[..]
Anyway I'll add more documentation, to make it more clear.
Any progress on this?
Specifically : i'm wondering about the "context" argument that you
provide: what does it store?
Also, procedures get a ! when they modify their first argument. Are you
following that convention?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
