Sorry, I missed your response.
The size of the plus sign looks alright to me, but yes, it should be
perfectly centered.
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 6:06 AM
Subject: Re: compond time signatures in 2.6.0 documentation
Of course you are right that the manual should be updated.
The problem is the old '\musicglyph #"scripts-stopped"' doesn't work
anymore
The glyph name has changed to scripts.stopped, which I hope that
convert-ly will update automatically. This is also what it says in
the manual.
> and '\column' now inserts spaces between the numbers in a
column, not what we want for compound time signatures.
That's why the example in the NEWS file sets the baseline-skip
parameter, among others.
I'm not fully convinced by the example in the NEWS file. Should really
the plus sign be that small, compared to the numbers?
Also, there's a space after the plus sign but not before, which looks
strange to me.
Nicolas'
'\forceAlteration' puts a natural or accidental in every note, not just
the first occurance of every note within a measure.
That should indicate that a
{\key c c! }
does not print a natural, which clearly looks like a bug.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
