Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aha -- now I see why you want to use ebnf instead of bnf -- you get each
> definition down to a single line.
that's right. the article in the link you posted doesn't say, but (I bet
you've figured) you can also use curly braces { and square brackets [
for grouping as in regular expressions.
here are a few more pointers you may want to see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Backus-Naur_form
http://www.augustana.ab.ca/~mohrj/courses/2000.fall/csc370/lecture_notes/ebnf.html
> available in the parser.output file, it may be possible to automatically
> generate an ebnf automatically.
that would be really nice.
Pedro
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
