[flup to lily-devel]
Peter Teeson wrote:
I've been lurking here so I may have missed it. But anyway here is my
question.
WRT fast changing syntax - do we have, or is it feasible/possible to
have, a formal grammar for the lily language?
I.E. formal in the mathematical sense?
Or are things still mutating so rapidly that we need some more Darwin
time to allow stabilisation?
The reason I ask is that it might help in the propsed re-factorisation
aspect of it.
BNF grammars have been posted here. Please search the archives.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
