----- Original Message -----
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: The optional \score? was: lilypond
./ChangeLoginput/regression/accidenta...
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
To further motivate why I'm so fond of \score:
Compare when you look at a new C/C++ program. Where do
you start looking? I and most other people certainly start
looking for main to get a starting point when finding out
what it does. When I see a new .ly file, I do the same,
looking for \score{...} to get a starting point.
Point taken. However, the regtest is a large collection of snippets, and
as such, we want to take out the redtape. Most of them have raggedright =
##t as well, but I haven't thought of a clean way to get rid of that.
I applaud your determination to make the Lilypond syntax as simple as
possible and I practically threw a party at the demise of \notes at the
2.2 --> 2.4 change, but I think you could spend your time more productively
than finding ways to get rid of \score and raggedright. \score is already
optional for extremely simple examples like { a' b' c'' }
Stephen
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
