On 9/22/05, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 00:39 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am looking for good comparisons between different typesetting > > > softwares' layout beautifulness. > > > > > > Lots of people have praised the beautifulness of lily's output on our > > > various lists; it seems that everyone agrees that the (untweaked) output > > > of lily is far more beautiful than the (untweaked) output of any other > > > music typesetting program. However, our lists is a very biased source. > > > > > > Does anyone know about a good third-party comparison of music notation > > > software, where lily is included, and where some general judgement of > > > beautifulness is included? > > > > there aren't, and that's because beauty is subjective. If you want > > objective measure, then compare with hand-engraved scores. That's also > > what we do. > > Then I'm looking for a third-party comparison between different music > notation software and corresponding hand-engraved scores. (I guess none > exists, though ...)
Are there yet professionally available editions engraved in LilyPond? Anybody working for Schott or Schirmer or UE using LilyPond yet? If not it's only a matter of time ... -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
