Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Well, it's a dangerous thing. Among other things, their version
numbers might collide badly with the official Debian ones. Best it
should have different package names to prevent this sort of thing from
happening.
Whe have this on our website, I think that Anthoy Fok provided
this recipe
We could also just copy your ./debian stuff and change the name to
lilypond-snapshot and lilypond-2.6-snapshot or something?
then again, who actually uses these recipes? We have spec files for
Fedora, Mandrake and SUSE, and only the Fedora one gets regular
maintenance, because I use it to build the RPM myself.
Perhaps it's better to put them into a separate "packaging" CVS repo.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
