Quoth Mats Bengtsson: > Quoting Don Blaheta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Quoth Mats Bengtsson: > >> Have you considered just making the stems invisible, as a workaround? > >> \override Stem #'transparent = ##t > > That's exactly how I work around it, but the results aren't exactly the > > same---slurs are rendered as if the stems were there. (This in turn can > > be worked around with judicious use of \stemDown and \stemUp, but the > > whole think is getting very crufty. ;) > > How about setting the stem length to zero?
Ah! Clever. > > Which reminds me, I also tried > > > > \override Stem #'print-function = ##f > > > > which I thought was supposed to have approximately the same effect as > > removing the engraver, but afaict it does nothing at all. > > I don't remember which LilyPond version you use. This property has > been renamed in the latest 2.7.x versions. Sho 'nuff. I'm using 2.7.33, but my initial exploration in the print-function direction was when I was in some 2.6 version. What's the new name, though? I'm not finding it right now. -- -=-Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]<http://www.blahedo.org/>-=- #define QUESTION ((bb) || !(bb)) //--Shakespeare _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
