On 2-Mar-06, at 5:46 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
Citerar Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The only line that might need explanation is the line-width. These
commands obvious set values; setting a value to #0 is pretty obvious,
This could be an area where extensive use of hyperlinks could be
useful (the
word line-width is linked to a page containing a description, which
says that
line-width is measured in staff-spaces, where staff-spaces is linked
to a page
that introduces the concept of staff-space). I don't know how much
work it
would require to add such machinery though, and I don't know how
useful it
would be either.
I suppose we could do a global search and replace on all "staff-spaces"
to replace it with @ref{}s... but we'd have to manually go through and
add those terms whenever appropriate. IMO, it's not worth it -- and
I'm certainly not interested in doing this myself. I'd still have
doubts even if somebody else did all the work and sent in a patch --
too many hyperlinks in the middle of text breaks up the flow, and
actually makes it harder to read.
I added some text to "scheme tutorial". I was looking for a place to
add it in "Changing defaults -> \override", but I discovered that it
was already mentioned.
I'm not throwing out the idea of making this info more prominent in a
future doc reorganization, but any such reorg would be two or more
months away.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
