> > Thanks. It should be distributed with lilypond, then. > > Umm. Python is *not* GPL. In particular, subprocess.py is *not* GPL. We > first had to get the permission to redistribute it from the author. The > file itself says
I said `distributed' -- this isn't the same as becoming part of lilypond. In groff, I also have some parts which are just bundled but not part of. > # Licensed to PSF under a Contributor Agreement. > # See http://www.python.org/2.4/license for licensing details. Hmm. It's getting complicated. Well, lilypond has some many dependencies, it probably doesn't matter if we have one more. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
