Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmmm; part of the problem might also stem from using CVS, which > doesn't have good cherry-picking for patches.
would it be a solution to use darcs only for the manual? I know there are some ways of syncing darcs and cvs, so maybe the doc stays in cvs and Graham has a private darcs repository where he can create branches, choose what patches should go where, and so on. this sort of stuff (mantain 2 different versions) is *very* easy with darcs. Pedro _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
